Tether CEO Criticizes Circle’s Arc Blockchain

- Paolo Ardoino criticizes Circle’s Arc blockchain as centralized and permissioned.
- Tether CEO prioritizes open, decentralized crypto values.
- Arc is positioned for institutional finance use cases.
Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino publicly criticized Circle’s new Arc blockchain on Twitter, highlighting its centralized design as a departure from decentralized crypto values.
This criticism of Circle’s Arc highlights ongoing tensions in crypto regarding decentralization versus institutional control, potentially affecting market dynamics and stablecoin positioning.
Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino has publicly criticized Circle’s newly announced Arc blockchain, characterizing it as a centralized and permissioned platform. Circle’s Arc is designed as a Layer 1 blockchain with a regulated, settlement-focused model.
Paolo Ardoino, a key figure at Tether, contends that Circle’s Arc design conflicts with open, decentralized cryptocurrency values. Circle leadership, including CEO Jeremy Allaire, introduced Arc with institutional-grade governance and compliance tooling.
Ardoino’s comments suggest a critical view of the potential impact of Arc’s centralized design on the blockchain industry. This development occurs alongside Circle’s announcement of a significant quarterly loss.
Circle’s formal positioning of Arc focuses on compliance and regulated settlement infrastructures, which contrasts with Tether’s emphasis on maintaining a lean and profitable crypto strategy without financial middleware.
Arc targets institutional finance, which may reshape industry dynamics if liquidity shifts towards its structured settlement approach. Ardoino’s focus on profitability and decentralized networks offers a point of contrast. As Ardoino stated, “Stablecoin infrastructure should be lean and profitable, focusing on open networks rather than middleware that increases centralization.”
Potential outcomes include shifts in USDC settlement channels and impacts on BTC and ETH, as institutional flows evolve. Historical precedents suggest similar compliance-centric blockchains have faced decentralization criticisms, influencing their adoption and perception.