- Main event, leadership changes, market impact, financial shifts, or expert insights.
- Jarrad Hope advocates for network states as nation-state alternatives.
- Network states concept influences crypto sovereign discussions.
Jarrad Hope, co-founder of Logos, posits that nation-states are obsolete, proposing network states as a new societal paradigm, gaining traction among key crypto innovators.
Hope’s theory influences the construction of decentralized governance systems, but nation-states push back, reflecting a struggle between traditional sovereignty and emerging digital autonomy.
Jarrad Hope of Logos promotes the emergent theory that network states can replace traditional nation-states. His book, “Farewell to Westphalia,” outlines a vision where decentralized technology enables governance across geographies, echoing sentiments in leading crypto circles.
Hope, co-founder of Logos, suggests that network states are “sovereign communities” in cyberspace, using decentralized protocols and DAOs. While no formal sovereign entities exist yet, this concept stimulates significant market experimentation and discourse.
“Modern nation-states are nearly 380 years old, predating even the scientific discovery of oxygen and gravity. The internet and blockchain present new tools for organizing society that allow people to build across geographies.” — Jarrad Hope, Co-founder, LogosState of Crypto Report 2025 Overview and Insights
The rise of network states has not led to direct market changes, though the idea is shaping decentralized governance experiments. Developers are focusing on DAOs and privacy protocols as building blocks for this potential new governance model.
Jarrad Hope emphasizes the challenge network states face from established nations and institutions. This resistance includes regulatory hurdles and infrastructural control, yet ambitions for digital sovereignty continue to drive innovation within blockchain projects.
2025 Cryptocurrency Ecosystem: Paradigm Shifts and InnovationsThe shift toward network states reflects historical attempts like Bitnation, which sought autonomy through blockchain. Current initiatives leverage Ethereum and privacy blockchains for developing decentralized identities, but recognition by existing authorities remains elusive.
Potential outcomes include a broader acceptance of digital governance models like DAOs, alongside technological advancements in privacy and identity protocols. These initiatives build on Ethereum’s infrastructure, suggesting possible regulatory and financial evolution in crypto governance.
