Meta Seeks Dismissal of Strike 3’s Porn-Piracy Lawsuit
- Meta challenges Strike 3’s piracy claims, dismissing evidence as unsupported.
- No impact on cryptocurrency assets or markets.
- Focus shifts to AI’s legal vulnerability amid copyright issues.
Meta Platforms Inc. seeks to dismiss a lawsuit by Strike 3 Holdings, alleging illicit downloading of adult films for AI training, describing the claims as baseless and unsupported by evidence.
The lawsuit underscores tensions around AI data usage, with potential repercussions for corporate copyright accountability and legal strategies in tech litigation.
Meta Platforms Inc. is seeking to dismiss a lawsuit by Strike 3 Holdings LLC, which accuses Meta of illegally downloading nearly 2,400 adult films to train its AI models. Meta denounces the claims as “nonsensical and unsupported.”
Meta argues that the alleged downloads likely occurred outside corporate directives, emphasizing a lack of direct connection to any Meta employee or AI model. The firm’s terms explicitly prohibit generating adult content, challenging the plausibility of these accusations. Meta Platforms, Inc., in a court filing, stated, “Monitoring every file downloaded by any person using Meta’s global network would be an extraordinarily complex and invasive undertaking.”
The immediate impact on Meta’s operations appears limited, with no reported effects on its financial market or cryptocurrency sectors. Meta’s AI budget is expected to exceed $71 billion by 2025 amidst increasing legal scrutiny.
Financially, Strike 3 pursues up to $360 million in damages, though there is no observable influence on cryptocurrency valuations, including Ethereum or Bitcoin, stemming from this legal action.
The case underscores tensions in the tech industry concerning AI training and copyright law. Similar lawsuits against other AI firms have emerged, but Meta’s vigorous legal defense highlights the complexities of AI data sourcing and usage.
Insights into the legal trajectory of AI technologies show potential regulatory tightening. Historical trends suggest increased litigation risks for AI firms, emphasizing the importance of navigating copyright intricacies in AI advancements.



