Crypto Bills, SEC-CFTC Meeting Postponed Due to Storms
- Winter storms delay US crypto bill markups and SEC-CFTC meeting.
- Senate Banking and Agriculture Committees affected.
- Rescheduling set for January 2026, impacting digital assets regulation.
The US Senate Banking and Agriculture Committees have postponed key markups on crypto market structure bills to January 29, 2026, due to travel disruptions from winter storms in Washington, D.C.
The delay in legislative actions underscores ongoing regulatory challenges and market adaptation issues affecting the cryptocurrency sector, highlighting the need for clear policy frameworks to ensure stability.
The US Senate Banking and Agriculture Committees have postponed the markup of crucial crypto market bills due to extreme winter storms. The new date is set for January 29, 2026, as severe weather led to travel disruptions in Washington, D.C..
Tim Scott, Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, spearheaded the delay decision, emphasizing ongoing work amid banking concerns. John Boozman of the Senate Agriculture Committee acknowledged the challenges, noting efforts to finalize bipartisan terms remain.
The postponement directly impacts both stakeholders and market structures, delaying regulatory clarity for the crypto industry. The decision affected scheduling, as the original markup was planned amid discussions on stablecoin regulation and digital asset frameworks.
Financial repercussions are anticipated, particularly in terms of stablecoin rewards and yield bans. The decision disrupts previously set plans, highlighting ongoing debates over banking and cryptocurrency regulations. Concern over market stability increases with regulatory delays.
The SEC-CFTC meeting on digital asset harmonization is also postponed to January 29. This postponement highlights the need for clear regulatory boundaries, a sentiment echoed by Michael Selig of the CFTC and Paul Atkins of the SEC.
Potential outcomes could include regulatory shifts and enhanced crypto market structure clarity. Insights suggest ongoing adaptation and collaboration among lawmakers to address evolving digital landscapes. Both historical trends and current analysis indicate a persistent push for structured crypto regulation.



